Soviet Ukraine as an illusion of historical subjectivity
This article deals with social, political and legal active ideas about the Soviet period in the history of Ukraine. The essential and substantial factual-documentary spring leads to the definition of the Soviet Phenomenon on the territory of Ukraine are presented. Impartially and as fundamentally as possible there is a consideration of the subjectivity of Ukraine in the framework of its administrative-subordinate involvement in the USSR. The attention to the space of the diplomatic history of Ukraine since 1945, the formation of international policy of the modern model from the metropolis of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic is updated. The analysis of the Soviet historical lesson for Ukraine is made by studying the legal basis (on the example of the study of Constitutions) for the existence of Ukraine and the continuation of its state-forming tradition in all possible formats and under all favorable political, cultural and socio-economic conditions.
Relevance. The Soviet period of Ukraine is quite difficult for the moral and national perception in an Independent Ukrainian state and at the same time a powerful historical sign for the Ukrainian empirical vision. An essential enhancement to the study of a very sensitive topic of the Soviet time in Ukraine is its direct involvement in European and world history in the difficult for them the twentieth century. The aim of the research is to study the range of poles: historical, political, social, legal approaches to the study of the Soviet past in Ukraine, to analyze its socio-economic matter and to determine the format of understanding the modern historiographical school and the documentary-factual Arsenal of the Soviet era of the morphology of the Soviet phenomenon in Ukraine.
The objectives of the study are to determine the essential excess effects of influence on the twenty-first century, to understand the conceptual background of Soviet anachronisms of Ukrainians in the legal connotation, moral and social perception. To understand the essence of the formation of Soviet power, the style and content of subjectivity of Ukraine under the cover of the USSR in the format of the Republic. It is necessary to understand the specifics of the Ukrainian state as much as possible through the prism of Soviet legal and administrative reality. It is necessary to define the role of Ukrainians as a donor of the Soviet people in captivity and Ukraine as an administrative player of the USSR. To determine the model of perception of the state within the USSR, which was formed from the foundations of Lenin’s theory of federalized structure of the new socialist state. To form an idea of the Soviet-style power in Ukraine and its formation by studying the constitutional models of that period. To summarize the current intention of modernity to the poly-factorial status of the Ukrainian SSR.
Aleksieiev, Yu.M., Kulchytskyi, S.V. & Sliusarenko, A.H. (2000). Ukraina na zlami istorychnykh epokh: Derzhavotvorchyi protses 1985-1999 rr. [Ukraine at the Turn of the Historic Era: The State-Building Process 1985-1999]. Kyiv: EksOb. [in Ukrainian].
Chekalenko, L.D. (1998). Ukraina v mizhnarodnykh vidnosynakh (1945-1996 rr.) [Ukraine in International Relations (1945-1996)]. Kyiv: Lybid. [in Ukrainian].
Chekalenko, L.D. (2006). Zovnishnia polityka Ukrainy [Foreign Policy of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Lybid. [in Ukrainian].
Chyrkov, O. (2003). Ukraina prostorova v kontseptsiinomu okreslenni Stepana Rudnytskoho [Ukraine is spatial in the conceptual outline of Stepan Rudnytsky]. Kyiv: Ukrainska Vydavnycha Spilka. [in Ukrainian].
Konyk, S.M. (2012). Derzhavotvorennia yak upravlinska katehoriia [State formation as a management category]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka, 2. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Dutp_2012_2_6 [in Ukrainian].
Likholat, A.V. (Ed.). (1985). Istoriia Ukrainskoi SSR (Vol. 9) [History of the Ukrainian SSR (Vol. 9)]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. [in Russian].
Serhiichuk, V. (2008). Etnichni mezhi i derzhavnyi kordon Ukrayiny [Ethnic borders and the state border of Ukraine]. Kyiv: PP Serhiichuk M.I. [in Ukrainian].
Shulha, M.O. (Ed.). (2017). Stan suchasnoho ukrainskoho suspilstva: tsyvilizatsiinyi vybir [The state of modern Ukrainian society: a civilizational choice]. Kyiv: Instytut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Sliusarenko, A.H. & Tomenko, M.V. (1993). Istoriia ukrainskoi konstytutsii [History of the Ukrainian Constitution]. Kyiv: Znannia. [in Ukrainian].
Taranov, A.P. (1957). Istoriia konstytutsii Ukrainskoi Radianskoi Sotsialistychnoi Respubliky [History of the Constitution of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Akademii nauk Ukrainskoi RSR. [in Ukrainian].
Vidnianskyi, S. (2015). Chomu ta yak Ukrayinska RSR stala odniieiu z krain-zasnovnyts OON? (do 70-richchia Orhanizatsii Obiednanykh Natsii i chlenstva v nii Ukrainy) [Why and how did the Ukrainian SSR become one of the founding countries of the UN? (to the 70th anniversary of the United Nations and Ukraine’s membership)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 5, 172-185. [in Ukrainian].
Zatonskyi, V. (1927). Natsionalna problema na Ukraini [National problem in Ukraine]. Kharkiv. [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 45 PDF Downloads: 30
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.