Capable territorial community as a basic of domestic state-building

Keywords: capable territorial community, decentralization, state-building, subsidiarity, deconcentration, political and legal culture

Abstract

The basic features and ways of capable territorial communities development are analyzed. It was noted that financial and economic efficiency, ability to create new and accumulate available resources, rationally manage them are important aspects of building capable territorial communities in Ukraine.

The essence of the principles of deconcentration, decentralization, subsidiarity and devolution as basic for the development of capable territorial communities in Ukraine is investigated. These principles are in a dialectical interrelation, so their implementation creates the maximum positive effect for state-building processes only in complex practice. There are several forms of decentralization, specifically territorial, functional and substantive. The first of the identified decentralization forms is particularly relevant for the development of capable territorial communities.

The interrelation between the formation of capable territorial communities and the intensification of state-building processes in our country is revealed. It has been proved that the strategy of domestic state-building, based on the mechanisms of decentralization, chosen in recent years, has given impetus to the strengthening of local self-government bodies. In its turn, the capable territorial community is gradually becoming an important component in the development of European Ukraine and the institutional form of democratic state formation.

The role of subsidiarity political and legal culture in strengthening the capability of territorial communities has been defined. It is emphasized that the development of capable territorial communities in Ukraine is impossible without democratic transformations in the political and legal culture of all subjects related to this process. In particular, scientific research is about the formation and development of subsidiarity legal and political culture as the basis for further reforms in Ukraine local self-government. The subsidiarity political-legal culture is primarily based on regional identity («local patriotism»), and with an adequate state policy, it becomes the basis for the national identity formation, contributes to the strengthening of state-building processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berdanova, O., Vakulenko, V., Hrynchuk, N., Koltun, V., Kuibida, V. & Tkachuk, A. (2017). Upravlinnia rozvytkom obiednanykh terytorialnykh hromad na zasadakh hromadskoi uchasti: navch. posib. [Management of United Territorial Community Development on a Community Engagement Framework: Educ. tool]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Boryslavska, O., Zaverukha, I. & Shkolyk, A. (2012). Detsentralizatsiia publichnoi vlady: dosvid yevropeiskykh krain ta perspektyvy Ukrainy. [Decentralization of public power: experience of European countries and prospects of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Moskalenko O.M. [in Ukrainian].

Detsentralizatsiia ta efektyvne mistseve samovriaduvannia: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia posadovtsiv mistsevykh ta rehionalnykh orhaniv vlady ta fakhivtsiv z rozvytku mistsevoho samovriaduvannia. (2007). [Decentralization and effective local self-government: a guide for local and regional government officials and local government development professionals]. Kyiv: PROON/ MPVSR [in Ukrainian].

Iievlieva, L. (2013). Dekontsentratsiia i detsentralizatsiia publichnoi vlady: rozuminnia katehorii. Vid hromadianskoho suspilstva – do pravovoi derzhavy: theses of scientific Internet-conference. [From civil society to the rule of law]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina, 188-190 [in Ukrainian].

Kalynovskyi, Yu. & Zhdanenko, S. (2012). Rol pravovoi kultury subsydiarnosti u rozvytku mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini. Suchasne suspilstvo: politychni nauky, sotsiolohichni nauky, kulturolohichni nauky: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats – Modern Society: political science, sociological sciences, cultural sciences: Collection of Scientific Works, 1, 33-41 [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, S. (2017). Zmitsnennia mistsevykh biudzhetiv v umovakh detsentralizatsii. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Actual Problems of Economics, 6, 186-195 [in Ukrainian].

Kovbasiuk, Yu., Vashchenko, K. & Tolkovanov, V. (Red). (2014). Mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan ta osnovni napriamy modernizatsii: nauk. dop. Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].

Kravchenko, V. (2017). Okremi pravovi aspekty formuvannia spromozhnykh (obiednanykh) terytorialnykh hromad. Visnyk Akademii pratsi, sotsialnykh vidnosyn i turyzmu – Journal of the Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism, 2, 78-80 [in Ukrainian].

Kvasnii, O. (2018). Avtonomiia terytorialnykh hromad – zaporuka vyrishennia «mistsevykh pytan» stosovno zabezpechennia mistsevoho ta suspilnoho rozvytku. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo – Scientific Bulletin of UNU. Series: International Economic Relations and World Economy, 20(2), 25-28 [in Ukrainian].

Olshanskyi, O. (2015). Obiednannia terytorialnykh hromad yak mekhanizm zabezpechennia yikh resursnoi spromozhnosti. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Pressing problems of public administration, 2, 92-99 [in Ukrainian].

Onupriienko, A. (2010). Pryntsyp subsydiarnosti v systemi mistsevoi vlady: aktualni pytannia. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, 108, 3-10 [in Ukrainian].

Panchenko, T. (2010). Rehionalna i lokalna identychnosti yak skladovi kultury subsydiarnoi demokratii. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. Seriia 22: Politychni nauky ta metodyka vykladannia sotsialno-politychnykh dystsyplin – Scientific Journal of Drahomanov NPU. Series 22: Political science and methods of teaching socio-political disciplines, 4, 72-77 [in Ukrainian].

Patytska, Kh. (2018). Formuvannia finansovo-ekonomichnoho potentsialu terytorialnykh hromad v umovakh realizatsii reformy mistsevoho samovriaduvannia: Candidate’s thesis. [Formation of financial and economic potential of territorial communities in the conditions of realization of local government reform]. Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Pavliuk, A. (2016). Ekonomichni aspekty formuvannia spromozhnykh terytorialnykh hromad v Ukraini. Stratehichni priorytety. Seriia: Ekonomika – Strategic Priorities. Series: Economy, 1, 137-146 [in Ukrainian].

Tsal-Tsalko, Yu. & Moroz, Yu. (2018). Statystychna i finansova zvitnist v systemi informatsiinykh resursiv dlia otsiniuvannia rozvytku biznesu terytorialnykh hromad. Naukovi horyzonty – Scientific horizons, 6, 36-46 [in Ukrainian].

Udod, Ye. (2015). Proektnyi pidkhid shchodo pidsylennia spromozhnosti terytorialnykh hromad v umovakh detsentralizatsii. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia – Public administration aspects, 4, 6-13 [in Ukrainian].


Abstract views: 44
PDF Downloads: 23
Published
2020-03-27
How to Cite
Kalynovskyi, Y. (2020). Capable territorial community as a basic of domestic state-building. Acta De Historia & Politica: Saeculum XXI, (01), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.26693/ahpsxxi2019.01.107
Section
Articles